I'm a Committed Free-Market Advocate, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Optimal Hope for American Healthcare

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.

Chloe Beck
Chloe Beck

Lena is a seasoned sports analyst with over a decade of experience in betting markets and statistical modeling.